Document Automation for High Case Volume Lawyers

Stop drowning in paperwork and start scaling your practice. Handle thousands of cases without thousands of employees.

Schedule a Free Consultation

Are You Drowning in Cases?

You're handling 100, 500, or even 1000+ cases at once. Each case follows the same pattern, uses similar arguments, and requires the same documents. But somehow, you're still:

  • Spending hours on repetitive document drafting when the legal strategy takes minutes to decide
  • Watching paralegals burn out assembling motions, pleadings, and letters from templates
  • Turning away business because you simply don't have the capacity
  • Worrying about errors when rushing through high volumes
  • Trapped in a margin squeeze where flat fees don't match the time investment

NYCM Claim No.: 2025-000123

Our File No.: NYCM.NFL-56789

CIVIL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF QUEENS

----------------------------------------------------------X

HEALTHCARE CO,
Plaintiff(s),

Index No.: 123456/25
AFFIRMATION IN SUPPORT
OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against-

INSURANCE CO,
Defendant(s).

----------------------------------------------------------X

Standard Operating Procedure

Motion for Summary Judgment - No-Fault Insurance Cases

1. Initial Case Review

  • Review complaint and identify all causes of action
  • Verify statute of limitations has expired for plaintiff's claims
  • Confirm lack of timely verification of medical necessity

2. Document Collection

  • Gather all claim forms (NYS form NF-3)
  • Obtain denial of claim letters and proof of mailing
  • Collect verification requests sent to plaintiff

3. Legal Arguments

  • Apply affirmative defense: Statute of Limitations
  • Apply affirmative defense: Failure to verify medical necessity

4. Motion Components

  • Draft Notice of Motion with return date
  • Prepare Attorney Affirmation in Support
  • Attach exhibits: claim forms, denials, verification requests

5. Quality Control

  • Verify all exhibit references match actual exhibits
  • Confirm all dates and case numbers are accurate
  • Attorney review before filing

Document Automation That Actually Works for Complex Legal Work

We don't just fill in blanks. We implement your firm's actual standard operating procedures using AI agents that understand legal reasoning.

Here's what makes us different:

Your paralegal knows exactly how to draft a motion for summary judgment. They know which affirmative defenses apply, which case law to cite, how to organize the facts. But it takes them 4-6 hours per motion because they're doing it manually.

We turn that expertise into a one-click pipeline. Upload your case documents, and our system follows your firm's playbook step-by-step: extract the relevant facts, apply your decision framework, pull in the right legal arguments, structure everything according to your preferences, and output a draft that's ready for attorney review.

The result: What took your team half a day now takes 15 minutes.

Works With the Systems You Already Use

Our automation platform integrates directly with your existing tools and workflows. Whether your firm lives in Outlook, Clio, NetDocuments, or a shared drive, we can connect to it seamlessly.

  • Automatic document intake: If your firm receives complaints or other filings by email, we can ingest them instantly and trigger your workflow to generate a draft answer within minutes.
  • Connects to case management: We integrate with platforms like Clio to pull matter data and push finalized drafts or PDFs back into your system automatically.
  • Uses your existing templates: Our legal AI agents can draft using your current Microsoft Word or PDF templates.
  • Output in familiar formats: Every document is delivered as a .docx or PDF.

New Case - Complaint Filed

Today, 9:24 AM
JD
John Davis9:24 AM
to me

Hi team,

We just received a new complaint that requires immediate attention. Please find the attached complaint document for case reference number 2025-CV-4521.

Case Summary:
Plaintiff: Metro Insurance Company
Defendant: HealthCare Services Corp
Filing Date: January 15, 2025
Jurisdiction: New York Supreme Court, Queens County

This appears to be a standard no-fault insurance dispute. We need to file our answer within 20 days. Please prioritize this case and prepare the initial response documents.

Best regards,
John Davis

Complaint_2025-CV-4521.pdf
847 KB • PDF

Who We Help

NY State No-Fault Defense Attorneys

Representing insurance companies in no-fault lawsuits? You know the challenge: tens of thousands of cases per year, all under $5,000, all requiring the same documents but with different facts.

What we automate:

  • Answers to complaints with the right affirmative defenses based on case facts
  • Motions for summary judgment with proper legal framework, case citations, and fact integration
  • All supporting documents following state court requirements

Defendant, by attorneys SMITH & SMITH, ESQS., answering the complaint of the plaintiff herein alleges:

Answering the First Cause of Action

1.

The allegations contained in Paragraphs designated "1" and "7" are admitted.

2.

Denies any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in Paragraphs designated "2", "3", "5", "8", "9", "11", and "13" of the complaint.

3.

Denies any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to each and every allegation contained in Paragraph designated "4" of the complaint and respectfully requests all questions of law be referred to the Court.

4.

Denies, upon information and belief, each and every allegation contained in Paragraphs designated "6" and "10" of the complaint.

5.

Denies, upon information and belief, each and every allegation contained in Paragraph designated "12" of the complaint and refers all questions of law to the Honorable Court.

Answering the Second Cause of Action

Beyond Templates: Legal AI Agents That Understand Your Practice

Traditional tools like Gavel.io and HotDocs rely on fill-in-the-blank templates. They work for simple forms, but fall apart when your documents require many inputs or more complex legal reasoning.

We build firm-specific legal AI agents that can follow your rules, decision frameworks, and drafting preferences with precision. These agents think through your workflow the same way your paralegal or associate would.

  • Allegation analysis: Go through each allegation in a complaint one by one and determine the proper response based on your firm's own rules and procedures.
  • Cross-reference validation: Review every cross-reference in a motion and double-check that it matches the actual exhibit. Increase accuracy and consistency.
  • Procedural history generation: Take a set of evidence documents and automatically draft an accurate procedural history tailored to your firm's framework for each type of legal argument.

What High-Throughput Firms Achieve

Time Savings

  • 70-80% reduction in document drafting time
  • Paralegals focus on strategy, not formatting
  • Attorneys spend time reviewing, not rewriting

Capacity Increase

  • Turn around cases in hours, not days
  • Stop turning away business due to capacity constraints

Quality Improvement

  • Fewer errors and omissions
  • Consistent application of best practices
  • Every document follows your proven template

Better Economics

  • Flat-fee practices see immediate margin improvement
  • More competitive pricing without sacrificing profit

Let's Talk About Your Practice

Frequently Asked Questions

Free Consultation

Is Document Automation Right for You?

In 30 minutes, we'll:

  1. 1.Understand your current document workflow
  2. 2.Identify automation opportunities
  3. 3.Estimate time and cost savings
  4. 4.Discuss next steps (no obligation)

About Us

Tommy Eberle

Tommy Eberle - Founder/CEO

LinkedIn

Before starting Avize, Tommy spent 3 years as a senior software engineer at Boosted.AI, a venture backed AI Fintech startup. Before that, he built high frequency options trading systems at IMC Trading. After starting Avize, Tommy became very interested in the law and specifically how AI will affect the practice of it.


Grant Willard

Grant Willard - Founder/CTO

LinkedIn

Before Avize, Grant spent more than five years at AWS building and operating secure identity systems that scale globally. As generative AI emerged, he contributed to Amazon’s early initiatives in the field and recognized its potential to reshape the legal profession. Today, he’s building Avize to bring reliable, compliant AI tools to lawyers.

Ready to scale your practice without scaling your headcount?

Schedule Your Free Consultation